Declarations for iv and code_info added (moved from types.h).

core allocation macros added.

util/ego/sr/sr.h

@@ -5,6 +5,42 @@
  */
 
 
+typedef struct iv	*iv_p;
+typedef struct code_info *code_p;
+
+/* An induction variable */
+
+struct iv {
+	offset	 iv_off;	/* offset of the induction variable */
+	line_p	 iv_incr;	/* pointer to last instr. of EM-code that
+				 * increments the induction variable	*/
+	offset	 iv_step;	/* step value				*/
+};
+
+
+/* All information about a reducible piece of code is collected in
+ * a single structure.
+ */
+
+struct code_info {
+	loop_p	  co_loop;	/* the loop the code is in		*/
+	bblock_p  co_block;	/* the basic block the code is in	*/
+	line_p	  co_lfirst;	/* first instruction of the code	*/
+	line_p	  co_llast;	/* last  instruction of the code	*/
+	line_p	  co_ivexpr;	/* start of linear expr. using iv	*/
+	line_p	  co_endexpr;	/* end of the expression		*/
+	int	  co_sign;	/* sign of iv in above expr		*/
+	iv_p	  co_iv;	/* the induction variable		*/
+	offset	  co_temp;	/* temporary variable			*/
+	int	  co_tmpsize;	/* size of the temp. variable (ws or ps)*/
+	int	  co_instr;	/* the expensive instruction (mli,lar..)*/
+	union {
+		line_p	co_loadlc;	/* LOC lc instruction (for mult.)*/
+		line_p  co_desc;	/* load address of descriptor
+					 *   (for lar etc.)		*/
+	} c_o;
+};
+
 #define LOAD 0
 #define STORE 1
 
@@ -26,3 +62,11 @@ extern bool arrbound_harmful;  /* Is it harmful to take the address of
 				* a non-existing array element ?
 				*/
 extern int Ssr;  /* #optimizations found */
+
+/* core allocation macros */
+#define newiv()		(iv_p)		newstruct(iv)
+#define newcinfo()	(code_p) 	newstruct(code_info)
+#define newsrlpx()	(lpext_p) 	newstruct(lpext_sr)
+#define oldiv(x)	oldstruct(iv,x)
+#define oldcinfo(x)	oldstruct(code_info,x)
+#define oldsrlpx(x)	oldstruct(lpext_sr,x)