minor improvement in layout
This commit is contained in:
parent
49e292676e
commit
838e83c1f3
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ The most straightforward layout is shown in figure 2.
|
||||||
|///////////////////////////////|
|
|///////////////////////////////|
|
||||||
0 \-> |-------------------------------|
|
0 \-> |-------------------------------|
|
||||||
.Df
|
.Df
|
||||||
Figure 2. Memory layout showing typical register
|
Figure 2. Memory layout showing typical register
|
||||||
positions during execution of an EM program.
|
positions during execution of an EM program.
|
||||||
.De
|
.De
|
||||||
.N 1
|
.N 1
|
||||||
The base registers for the various memory pieces can be stored
|
The base registers for the various memory pieces can be stored
|
||||||
|
@ -140,11 +140,11 @@ lower physical address than the second element.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Type A Type B
|
Type A Type B
|
||||||
.Df
|
.Df
|
||||||
Figure 3. Two possible memory implementations.
|
Figure 3. Two possible memory implementations.
|
||||||
Numbers within the boxes are EM addresses.
|
Numbers within the boxes are EM addresses.
|
||||||
The other numbers are physical addresses.
|
The other numbers are physical addresses.
|
||||||
.De
|
.De
|
||||||
.A 0 0
|
.A 1 0
|
||||||
So, we have two different EM memory implementations:
|
So, we have two different EM memory implementations:
|
||||||
.IS
|
.IS
|
||||||
.PS - 4
|
.PS - 4
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue