Changed use of word_align: it now only indicates the alignment on
which word-operations are allowed to take place
This commit is contained in:
parent
d034f5145c
commit
d04dce377a
|
@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ EVAL(expr, val, code, true_label, false_label)
|
|||
if (gencode) {
|
||||
if (is_struct_or_union(tp->tp_fund)) {
|
||||
C_lfr(pointer_size);
|
||||
load_block(tp->tp_size, word_align);
|
||||
load_block(tp->tp_size, (int) word_size);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
C_lfr(ATW(tp->tp_size));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -414,9 +414,9 @@ add_field(szp, fd, fdtpp, idf, stp)
|
|||
/* align this selector on the next boundary :
|
||||
the previous selector wasn't a bitfield.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
field_offset = align(*szp, word_align);
|
||||
*szp = field_offset + word_size;
|
||||
stp->tp_align = lcm(stp->tp_align, word_align);
|
||||
field_offset = align(*szp, int_align);
|
||||
*szp = field_offset + int_size;
|
||||
stp->tp_align = lcm(stp->tp_align, int_align);
|
||||
bits_declared = (arith)0;
|
||||
field_busy = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -424,9 +424,9 @@ add_field(szp, fd, fdtpp, idf, stp)
|
|||
if (fd->fd_width > bits_in_type - bits_declared) {
|
||||
/* field overflow: fetch next memory unit
|
||||
*/
|
||||
field_offset = align(*szp, word_align);
|
||||
*szp = field_offset + word_size;
|
||||
stp->tp_align = lcm(stp->tp_align, word_align);
|
||||
field_offset = align(*szp, int_align);
|
||||
*szp = field_offset + int_size;
|
||||
stp->tp_align = lcm(stp->tp_align, int_align);
|
||||
bits_declared = fd->fd_width;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue